Automoderated users, edit
3,552
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − − == Superb == − − This is superb! In reply to Ed, I agree that the statement this confirms the multiplication of the loaves is over-the-top, though funny. Thanks for deleting the comedy.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:53, 4 January 2010 (EST) − :Thanks, Andy! For the record, I didn't add the fish and loaves stuff, that appears to be users named Foxtrot and Aroth. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 00:53, 5 January 2010 (EST)
no edit summary
Since the article doesn't explain how the sphere is split, we'd better describe it as a '''claim''' made by certain parties, much as the claim made by [[AGW]] supporters that their [[global climate model]]s explain or predict anything. Since GCMs have never been explained in any encyclopedia article I've read, I assume they are too esoteric for us laymen to understand (or check). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:15, 4 January 2010 (EST)
Since the article doesn't explain how the sphere is split, we'd better describe it as a '''claim''' made by certain parties, much as the claim made by [[AGW]] supporters that their [[global climate model]]s explain or predict anything. Since GCMs have never been explained in any encyclopedia article I've read, I assume they are too esoteric for us laymen to understand (or check). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:15, 4 January 2010 (EST)
:Not at all. I can have a complete description of the Banach-Tarski paradox up by tonight which will be accessible to anybody who understands irrational numbers. I'll try and have it up by tonight. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 19:30, 4 January 2010 (EST)
:Not at all. I can have a complete description of the Banach-Tarski paradox up by tonight which will be accessible to anybody who understands irrational numbers. I'll try and have it up by tonight. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 19:30, 4 January 2010 (EST)
== Purpose of Construction ==
== Purpose of Construction ==