5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo? (view source)
Revision as of 13:59, June 7, 2010
, 13:59, June 7, 2010→Messed up
::Obviously this user needs to open his mind. He probably doesn't support school prayer and I'm 96% certain he also believes in gun control. [[User:KevinO|KevinO]] 22:46, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
::Obviously this user needs to open his mind. He probably doesn't support school prayer and I'm 96% certain he also believes in gun control. [[User:KevinO|KevinO]] 22:46, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
::::If there are typos and/or spelling errors, please list them on the talk page. Unless, of course, you lack the machismo to do so! :) [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 00:53, 7 June 2010 (EDT)
::::If there are typos and/or spelling errors, please list them on the talk page. Unless, of course, you lack the machismo to do so! :) [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 00:53, 7 June 2010 (EDT)
Grammar/Spelling problems:
Senor ---> Señor
Ole ---> Olé
Polling in 2006 indicates that less than half of the US and British populace accept the evolutionary paradigm as the best description for the development of life.
In addition.
polling indicates that the evolutionary paradigm is losing public support in the United States.[8]
So the key question stirring around the much discussed U.S Religious Landscape Survey released in late February by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life is what tale does it state about the state of the union.
But atheist make up only 1.6% of respondents to this survey....
Within the evolutionaryscience community and the creation science community, Richard Dawkins has faced charges of engaging in pseudoscience and has also faced charges of committing elementary errors.[10]
Of course, if Senor Dawkins published fine works in the field of Christian apologetics, Senor Dawkins would have great confidence his work could withstand scrutiny and he wouldn't have to spend so much time in his "intellectual bunnyhole" hiding from strong debaters of the opposition.
And there's more. This article needs many, many corrections.