Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply
Line 26: Line 26:     
I see nothing wrong with this letter. However, I'm not exactly sure what you hope to accomplish by sending it. Do you want to see the draft on which they are working? Do you just want him to answer the questions that you pose? Do you want him to allow you and the members of Conservapedia to revise the new translation and make suggestions as necessary? Perhaps if you make specific requests, Douglas Moo's response will be more to your satisfaction. I would make suggestions to improve the letter, but I need to know what it is that you hope to accomplish. Any clarifications would be helpful and I'm sure Professor Moo would appreciate it too! [[User:PaulRy|PaulRy]] 22:28, 7 June 2010 (EDT)  
 
I see nothing wrong with this letter. However, I'm not exactly sure what you hope to accomplish by sending it. Do you want to see the draft on which they are working? Do you just want him to answer the questions that you pose? Do you want him to allow you and the members of Conservapedia to revise the new translation and make suggestions as necessary? Perhaps if you make specific requests, Douglas Moo's response will be more to your satisfaction. I would make suggestions to improve the letter, but I need to know what it is that you hope to accomplish. Any clarifications would be helpful and I'm sure Professor Moo would appreciate it too! [[User:PaulRy|PaulRy]] 22:28, 7 June 2010 (EDT)  
 +
 +
: Please see below as a rebuttal of your comments.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:32, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
    
==Interview with Moo==
 
==Interview with Moo==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,305

edits

Navigation menu