Changes

I'm not sure the tone of the article is appropriate. While I agree, and it is obvious, that the bill does not beg racial profiling, asking "liberals" to read the article in the article ("Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.") and then later posing questions to them makes this work seem like a pseudo-homework assignment as opposed to an encyclopedia article--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:24, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

I'm not sure the tone of the article is appropriate. While I agree, and it is obvious, that the bill does not beg racial profiling, asking "liberals" to read the article in the article ("Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.") and then later posing questions to them makes this work seem like a pseudo-homework assignment as opposed to an encyclopedia article--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:24, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

:The deleted the part that you said to delete: "Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please. Thanks..." However, I still think the questions are still appropriate to challenge liberals, but I agree with TK that the tone of the questions to liberals at the end of the article should be changed into a more encyclopediatic form. [[User: Willminator|Willminator]] 16:06, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

:I deleted the part that you said to delete: "Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please. Thanks..." However, I still think the questions are still appropriate to challenge liberals, but I agree with TK that the tone of the questions to liberals at the end of the article should be changed into a more encyclopediatic form. [[User: Willminator|Willminator]] 16:06, 8 June 2010 (EDT)