Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
removed another dubious, unsourced reference... conclusions are speculative and not concrete, even if true, does not mean it is necessarily "impossible" that the earth is old, or young for that matter
Line 14: Line 14:  
# An extrapolation of time between the collapse of weaker arches<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/11/AR2008081102290.html</ref> with still-standing stronger arches supports a young earth age
 
# An extrapolation of time between the collapse of weaker arches<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/11/AR2008081102290.html</ref> with still-standing stronger arches supports a young earth age
 
# The massive [[Great Lakes]] are receding in volume too rapidly to have existed millions of years ago
 
# The massive [[Great Lakes]] are receding in volume too rapidly to have existed millions of years ago
−
# Freshwater lakes are known to be relatively young.<ref>[[Ice Age]] theories were developed to try to explain this, but massive freshwater lakes exist even near the equator</ref>
   
# The existence of inland saltwater lakes, such as [[Mono Lake]] and the [[Great Salt Lake]], suggest a recent global [[flood]]
 
# The existence of inland saltwater lakes, such as [[Mono Lake]] and the [[Great Salt Lake]], suggest a recent global [[flood]]
 
# The plentiful supply of high concentrations of underground well water, which would be expected based on familiar principles of [[entropy]] to dissipate over a long period of time.
 
# The plentiful supply of high concentrations of underground well water, which would be expected based on familiar principles of [[entropy]] to dissipate over a long period of time.
22

edits

Navigation menu