1,237
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 113:
Line 113: +
→Really?: response
Was [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&curid=52518&diff=786096&oldid=786093 this] completely necessary? I said 3x that I've discussed it on the talk page and no one can be bothered to reply? Am I missing something? [[User:DouglasM|DouglasM]] 19:49, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
Was [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&curid=52518&diff=786096&oldid=786093 this] completely necessary? I said 3x that I've discussed it on the talk page and no one can be bothered to reply? Am I missing something? [[User:DouglasM|DouglasM]] 19:49, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
:I may have saved you from getting blocked, actually. When an edit is reverted by an administrator ([User:DouglasA]), it is typically common procedure to either (a.) wait for the reverting admin to address your concerns on the article's talk page, or (b.) step away from it for a bit until the necessary parties (i.e. senior admins) have had a chance to address your concerns. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:53, 8 June 2010 (EDT)