Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Arizona's 2010 Immigration Act

356 bytes added, 21:31, 10 June 2010
'''No. The Federal Law is far more draconian than Arizona's.''' That is the salient point. I suggest a Google search....I have seen comparisons on Michelle Malkin's site and O'Reilly's for sure, possibly Hannity's. The whole point is the "protests" about the AZ law are totally contrived, liberal clap-trap. Where were the protests about the Federal law? It allows Federal Officers to stop and detain anyone, even you or I, for any reason whatsoever, no matter if we didn't even break a law....and the Arizona law has safeguards in place to prevent that kind of thing from happening. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:35, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
:I reworded a bit the first 2 questions to liberals and the last section's title to reflect a bit more on the point you mentioned. Anyway, I found this interesting article that contains some useful for the U.S immigration policy vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 section, but I don’t know what to write from this. What should we take from this? [] [[User: Willminator|Willminator]] 16:53, 9 June 2010 (EDT)
== Questions ==
I'm not sure the tone of the article is appropriate. While I agree, and it is obvious, that the bill does not beg racial profiling, asking "liberals" to read the article in the article ("Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.") and then later posing questions to them makes this work seem like a pseudo-homework assignment as opposed to an encyclopedia article--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:24, 8 June 2010 (EDT)