Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Reorganization: Thanks for your suggestion, but wouldn't ranking by significance make the most sense?
Line 50: Line 50:     
If nobody minds, I think this list would be greatly improved if it were organized chronologically (or alphabetically, I guess). I started arranging things in chronological order and encourage anyone adding new films to please put them in order as well. This would be helpful for research purposes and general organization. Thanks! [[User:EMorris|EMorris]] 12:23, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
 
If nobody minds, I think this list would be greatly improved if it were organized chronologically (or alphabetically, I guess). I started arranging things in chronological order and encourage anyone adding new films to please put them in order as well. This would be helpful for research purposes and general organization. Thanks! [[User:EMorris|EMorris]] 12:23, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Thanks for your suggestion, but wouldn't ranking by significance make the most sense?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:47, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu