14
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + +
→The creation-evolution debate
Let's not have mini-debates all over the project. If we are to present the [[Origins debate]] at all, let's do it in an organized way. Let's lay out the case for each side. I can think of at least two (and maybe four) different ideas about the origin of species. Let's be intellectually honest, okay? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:22, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Let's not have mini-debates all over the project. If we are to present the [[Origins debate]] at all, let's do it in an organized way. Let's lay out the case for each side. I can think of at least two (and maybe four) different ideas about the origin of species. Let's be intellectually honest, okay? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:22, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
I agree, and also it would be useful if conservapedians could get their act together. citing the FDA stating ""The increased prevalence of antibiotic resistance is an outcome of evolution" while also holding several articles attempting to provide evidence against evolution is misleading, regardless of the website's stance. --JacobS(who will eventually get the hang of this internet thing) 19:30, 14 June 2010 (EDT)