| Line 46: |
Line 46: |
| | -- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227). | | -- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227). |
| | | | |
| − | But it would be a nice reminder that atheist didn't realy mass murder people in order to convert them(see crusades,jihad etc)I don't know if the charity thingy is actualy true but maybe they are giving more just becouse they feel guilty about all the killing in Jesus's name. And by the way Jesus WAS a LIBERAl.
| + | -- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html</ref>}} |
| | + | [[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].<ref>http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=152</ref> Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&page=2] |
| | | | |
| | == Liberal politicians and uncharitableness == | | == Liberal politicians and uncharitableness == |
| − | It has been proven that liberals are smarter , richer and healthier on average than republicans.<ref>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&c=1</ref>
| + | The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.<ref>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&c=1</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | In addition, [[Barack Obama]] scares republicans. [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]]. | + | In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]]. |
| | | | |
| | ==Liberals and Superstition== | | ==Liberals and Superstition== |
| Line 78: |
Line 79: |
| | ==Liberalism in Europe today== | | ==Liberalism in Europe today== |
| | | | |
| − | In Europe, on the other hand liberals own the place. Naturaly republicans will lie and call european liberals politicaly center not left but when do republicans realy tell the truth. Come to the liberal side we have cookies ;). | + | In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe<ref>http://www.alde.eu</ref> is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,<ref>http://www.liberal-international.org/</ref> such as the Liberal Party of Australia.<ref>[http://www.liberal.org.au/]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them "liberals" or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, "liberal" may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called "liberal" in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.<ref>[http://www.pes.org]</ref> | | Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them "liberals" or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, "liberal" may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called "liberal" in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.<ref>[http://www.pes.org]</ref> |
| Line 86: |
Line 87: |
| | | | |
| | ==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism== | | ==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism== |
| − | Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as lack of moral values and tradition.But realy most of our founding fathers and even Abe Lincoln the founder of the Republican Party would be characterized today as liberals , so what exactly are conservatives conservating ? Maybe the confederacy...just a sugestion. And yes Licoln is rolling in his grave each time he hears what his party has become. | + | Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition. |
| | | | |
| | See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]]. | | See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]]. |