Changes

You harshly criticized our translation effort, pompously and publicly declaring that "Silly is probably as kind as I could be about it."<ref>http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2009/10/andy-schlafly%E2%80%99s-conservative-bible-project/</ref>  Yet we completed our work in the New Testament over a month ago, all in full public view.  '''''Where, pray tell, is yours?'''''

You harshly criticized our translation effort, pompously and publicly declaring that "Silly is probably as kind as I could be about it."<ref>http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2009/10/andy-schlafly%E2%80%99s-conservative-bible-project/</ref>  Yet we completed our work in the New Testament over a month ago, all in full public view.  '''''Where, pray tell, is yours?'''''

In an interview you said that Biblica was intent "on deflecting any possible claim that the 2011 NIV was a secretive project"<ref>[http://www.dashhouse.com/2009/09/interview-with-douglas-moo-on-the-2011-niv/ Interview with Douglas Moo on the 2011 NIV]</ref>. We at Conservapedia sincerely hope you meant that and were not merely engaging in [[Liberal denial]]. The [[Conservative Bible Project]] was completely open to the public. We would appreciate any updates you have on your project, especially with regards to the issues of gender-inclusive and pro-abortion language.  

In an interview, you indicated that Biblica was intent "on deflecting any possible claim that the 2011 NIV was a secretive project"<ref>[http://www.dashhouse.com/2009/09/interview-with-douglas-moo-on-the-2011-niv/ Interview with Douglas Moo on the 2011 NIV]</ref>. We at Conservapedia sincerely hope you meant that and were not merely engaging in [[Liberal denial]]. The [[Conservative Bible Project]] is completely open to the public<ref>See [[Best of the public]].</ref>. We would appreciate any updates you have on your project, especially regarding the issues of gender-inclusive and pro-abortion language.  

Sincerely,

Sincerely,