18
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: − +
→Scientific
Some specific arguments are as follows:
Some specific arguments are as follows:
* The [[First Law of Thermodynamics|first law of thermodynamics]] and [[Second law of thermodynamics|second law of thermodynamics]] argue against an eternal universe and these laws point to the universe being created by [[God]].<ref>[http://godevidences.net/space/lawsofscience.php Evidences for God From Space—Laws of Science]</ref><ref>Thompson, Bert, [http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2329 So Long, Eternal Universe; Hello Beginning, Hello End!], 2001 (Apologetics Press)</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html</ref>
* The [[First Law of Thermodynamics|first law of thermodynamics]] and [[Second law of thermodynamics|second law of thermodynamics]] argue against an eternal universe and these laws point to the universe being created by [[God]].<ref>[http://godevidences.net/space/lawsofscience.php Evidences for God From Space—Laws of Science]</ref><ref>Thompson, Bert, [http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2329 So Long, Eternal Universe; Hello Beginning, Hello End!], 2001 (Apologetics Press)</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html</ref> However, the question of whether the Universe is Eternal or not has not been decided by scientists, it is still being debated. But the laws of Thermodynamics could certainly be interpreted to imply an eternal nature (matter and energy can neither be created nor destroyed).
* The [[theory of evolution]] is at odds with YEC scientific evidence. They often cite secular scientific sources which agree with them on various points (for further details please see: [[theory of evolution]] and [[creationism]]).<ref>http://creation.com/frequently-asked-questions-faq</ref> However, there is no real accepted scientific evidence that has been found to invalidate the theory of Evolution. Rest assured, that Evolution scientists would never try to hide such evidence since finding it would be career-making. Instead, such evidence, were it to be found, would be cause for revising the theory in light of new evidence.
* The [[theory of evolution]] is at odds with YEC scientific evidence. They often cite secular scientific sources which agree with them on various points (for further details please see: [[theory of evolution]] and [[creationism]]).<ref>http://creation.com/frequently-asked-questions-faq</ref> However, there is no real accepted scientific evidence that has been found to invalidate the theory of Evolution. Rest assured, that Evolution scientists would never try to hide such evidence since finding it would be career-making. Instead, such evidence, were it to be found, would be cause for revising the theory in light of new evidence.
* Both evolutionary scientists and young earth creation scientists believe that [[speciation]] occurs, however, young earth creation scientists state that speciation generally occurs at a much faster rate than evolutionary scientists believe is the case.<ref>[[Creation Ministries International]], [http://www.creation.com/content/view/3036/ Speciation: Questions and Answers]</ref> Needless to say, just stating something like that doesn't really make it true.
* Both evolutionary scientists and young earth creation scientists believe that [[speciation]] occurs, however, young earth creation scientists state that speciation generally occurs at a much faster rate than evolutionary scientists believe is the case.<ref>[[Creation Ministries International]], [http://www.creation.com/content/view/3036/ Speciation: Questions and Answers]</ref> Needless to say, just stating something like that doesn't really make it true.