Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 125: Line 125:  
* Funny, your idea that moderates do not matter. So if you have in a group only 99 moderates, and one Liberal, it would be as Liberal, as if it had 100 Liberals, and no moderates?  
 
* Funny, your idea that moderates do not matter. So if you have in a group only 99 moderates, and one Liberal, it would be as Liberal, as if it had 100 Liberals, and no moderates?  
 
* Why don't you respond to the fact that your definition of liberal bias in Wikipedia is based on quick sand? Or thin air.  
 
* Why don't you respond to the fact that your definition of liberal bias in Wikipedia is based on quick sand? Or thin air.  
−
* And I did tell you what my definition of liberal bias in a population is. Twice. In this section, called '''Ratio (again)''' , you'll find two itemized lists (lists with bullet points). And the last item in both lists tells you to take the percentage of liberals (which is equal to Liberal/Population). You said now for the second time that nobody gave you an alternative definition. I assume that you are smart guy, so tell me why you didn't see it? And could you for a change start answering question, rather than evade them.[[User:Order]]
+
* And I did tell you what my definition of liberal bias in a population is. Twice. In this section, called '''Ratio (again)''' , you'll find two itemized lists (lists with bullet points). And the last item in both lists tells you to take the percentage of liberals (which is equal to Liberal/Population). You said now for the second time that nobody gave you an alternative definition. I assume that you are smart guy, so tell me why you didn't see it? And could you for a change start answering questions, rather than evade them.[[User:Order]]
    
== Re: #6 (Great Flood) ==
 
== Re: #6 (Great Flood) ==
2,002

edits

Navigation menu