Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
225 bytes added ,  15:49, June 30, 2010
An unused account does not merit blockage
Line 50: Line 50:     
Great blocks.  Note that, in order to permit account recreation under a different name from the same IP, '''both''' options in the block function must be unchecked.  In your two blocks this morning, your settings were probably appropriate anyway in light of the inappropriate names used.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:28, 29 June 2010 (EDT)
 
Great blocks.  Note that, in order to permit account recreation under a different name from the same IP, '''both''' options in the block function must be unchecked.  In your two blocks this morning, your settings were probably appropriate anyway in light of the inappropriate names used.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:28, 29 June 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Why are you blocking so many accounts?  I've temporarily taken away your blocking privileges until this is discussed.  An unused account does not merit blockage.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:49, 30 June 2010 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,203

edits

Navigation menu