28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 467:
Line 467: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 12:39, April 1, 2007
, 12:39, April 1, 2007Number 2
I would personally love to see this page deleted. It's probably apparent I'm not a conservative, but I hate to see websites making themselves look bad, and this page makes conservapedia look like a hypocritical bully.--[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 18:06, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
I would personally love to see this page deleted. It's probably apparent I'm not a conservative, but I hate to see websites making themselves look bad, and this page makes conservapedia look like a hypocritical bully.--[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 18:06, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
== Number 2 ==
How is this bias? I found the source used for 'half the 9th graders lacked proficiency etc etc', and it pretty much supports what Wikipedia said. (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/16/MNGE2KJB5K1.DTL)
The SFGate article does say that 47% of 9th graders showed proficiency on the english test; however, it also says that it improved 39% from the year before in the next sentence. Good job being 'neutral to the facts.'
And, as far as I can see, the article is a good article; its well-cited, informative, and unbiased.