Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)

Revision as of 20:36, July 1, 2010

213 bytes added ,  20:36, July 1, 2010
→‎Questionable Probabilities: We welcome suggestions on explaining truths better. Censorship is not welcome here.
Line 425: Line 425:  
::::''If you have a better way of stating it, let's see it.'' No, I've no better way of stating it, as I don't think it can be stated correctly. May I add that deleting a wrong point from an ecyclopedia isn't censorship, but just due editorial process?  
 
::::''If you have a better way of stating it, let's see it.'' No, I've no better way of stating it, as I don't think it can be stated correctly. May I add that deleting a wrong point from an ecyclopedia isn't censorship, but just due editorial process?  
 
::::[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 12:29, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
 
::::[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 12:29, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::: No, Frank, you're challenging a mathematical truth here.  We welcome suggestions on explaining truths better.  [[Censorship]] is not welcome here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:36, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/792111"

Navigation menu