Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 118: Line 118:  
:: Order, you still haven't provided an alternative definition of a liberal quotient for a group.  The only sensible definition using a scale between 0 and infinity is the ratio of liberals to conservatives.  If you're giving me such grief over such an obvious and simple definition, then I hate to think how you would have objected to [[Lord Kelvin]]!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:43, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:: Order, you still haven't provided an alternative definition of a liberal quotient for a group.  The only sensible definition using a scale between 0 and infinity is the ratio of liberals to conservatives.  If you're giving me such grief over such an obvious and simple definition, then I hate to think how you would have objected to [[Lord Kelvin]]!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:43, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
   −
You requirement that it has to map from zero to infinity is kind of arbitrary, because you can map any function over an infinite domain to the [zero,infinity] domain. Basic math. No need to invoke Lord Kelvin. Lol. Was it you who complained about ''elemntary proof'', or was it your alter ego?
+
Your requirement that it has to map from zero to infinity is kind of arbitrary, because you can map any function over an infinite domain to the [zero,infinity] domain. Basic math. No need to invoke Lord Kelvin. Lol. Was it you who complained about ''elemntary proof'', or was it your alter ego?
    
My alternative definition for liberal bias is either:
 
My alternative definition for liberal bias is either:
2,002

edits

Navigation menu