Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Virtually all well-tested fundamental physical forces satisfy the requirements of a conservative field, but theories of relativity fail
Line 21: Line 21:  
#Relativity requires different values for the inertia of a moving object: in its direction of motion, and perpendicular to that direction.  This contradicts the logical principle that the laws of physics are the same in all directions.
 
#Relativity requires different values for the inertia of a moving object: in its direction of motion, and perpendicular to that direction.  This contradicts the logical principle that the laws of physics are the same in all directions.
 
#Relativity requires that anything traveling at the speed of light must have mass zero, so it must have momentum zero.  But the laws of electrodynamics require that light have nonzero momentum.
 
#Relativity requires that anything traveling at the speed of light must have mass zero, so it must have momentum zero.  But the laws of electrodynamics require that light have nonzero momentum.
 +
#Virtually all well-tested fundamental physical forces satisfy the requirements of a [[conservative field]], but theories of relativity fail.
    
(add to list)
 
(add to list)
Line 28: Line 29:  
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
 
* [[Counterexamples to Evolution]]
 
* [[Counterexamples to Evolution]]
 +
* [http://www2.udec.cl/~rvera/Adilemma.pdf A dilemma]
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,644

edits

Navigation menu