Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 48:
Line 48: − YOU IDOTIC BASTARDS COMPARE OBAMA TO HITLER AND BIG BROTHER THAN YOU GO SAYING THAT OVETLY LIBERAL OR EXPLICIT OR CONTRAVERSIAL BOOKS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM CENTERS OF PUBLIC USE. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?+ + + + + +
Debate: Should certain books be banned from libraries? (view source)
Revision as of 04:02, July 7, 2010
, 04:02, July 7, 2010Reverted edits by Timmy77 (Talk) to last revision by Redrocket
Libraries have and already do censor books becuase there have been many times where i went to local library and i was unable to find what i was looking for becuase it was to conserative.
Libraries have and already do censor books becuase there have been many times where i went to local library and i was unable to find what i was looking for becuase it was to conserative.
==No, no, no, no...no.==
Tell me, what does censorship accomplish? It takes away someone's access to information. Now that is done, all that is left is one side. One sided information creates drones. People who are the same. Now, if everyone were the same, we couldn't really have progress. Here are some examples of people who have been labeled different, people with new ideas, that were considered bad. MLK, Galileo Galilei, and Jesus. -[[User:Nono|Nono]] 16:21, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
No idea in and of itself, has ever caused harm. It is how a person uses that idea that causes harm. Reading something opens your mind to possibilities. it is the choice of the path you take that defines who you are, what you are.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:31, 11 November 2008 (EST)
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
==Yes!==
==Yes!==