1,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 123:
Line 123: + +
→Women's influence on science: some recommendations for Ed
::But it's '''because''' their contributions are so rare that one is interested; the last thing I'd want to do is pretend that their contributions have been commensurate. That would sweep under the rug any actual differences due to inclination or opportunity. Let's keep it real, baby. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:48, 14 July 2010 (EDT)
::But it's '''because''' their contributions are so rare that one is interested; the last thing I'd want to do is pretend that their contributions have been commensurate. That would sweep under the rug any actual differences due to inclination or opportunity. Let's keep it real, baby. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:48, 14 July 2010 (EDT)
:::<i>if there have been any women composers whose compositions I've been ignoring, I'd love to listen to their music.</i> As for the romantics, I'd recommend Clara Schumann, Fanny Mendelssohn (Hensel), and Amy Beach. [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 08:51, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
Well, how about this revision: "''Second, there are the men (and in more recent times, women) of science who have amassed these descriptions and communicate them to everyone else.''".
Well, how about this revision: "''Second, there are the men (and in more recent times, women) of science who have amassed these descriptions and communicate them to everyone else.''".
I think this portrays the increased influence women have had, without sounding all feminazish.--[[User:Jaddriscoll|Jaddriscoll]]
I think this portrays the increased influence women have had, without sounding all feminazish.--[[User:Jaddriscoll|Jaddriscoll]]