| Line 47: |
Line 47: |
| | |[[Anti-war]] liberals often try to shut down recruitment centers with protests most notably on college campuses, with little success. | | |[[Anti-war]] liberals often try to shut down recruitment centers with protests most notably on college campuses, with little success. |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |[[Homosexual agenda]] | + | |Opposition to the [[Homosexual agenda]] |
| | |30% | | |30% |
| | |By claiming that criticism of immoral and unhealthy lifestyles is "bigotry," pro-homosexual activists are able to censor critiques of their political agenda. | | |By claiming that criticism of immoral and unhealthy lifestyles is "bigotry," pro-homosexual activists are able to censor critiques of their political agenda. |
| Line 69: |
Line 69: |
| | |[[Creationism]] | | |[[Creationism]] |
| | |90% | | |90% |
| − | |Absent from virtually every public school curriculum world-wide | + | |Absent from virtually every public school curriculum worldwide |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |[[Classroom prayer]] | | |[[Classroom prayer]] |
| − | |100% | + | |99% |
| | |Banned for over a hundred million by the actions of a handful | | |Banned for over a hundred million by the actions of a handful |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |} | | |} |
| | | | |
| − | Over time, movements that are relatively difficult to censor -- i.e., have a low censorability -- can thrive. An example is the [[pro-life]] movement: it has virtually a perfect "0%" censorability. | + | Over time, movements that are relatively difficult to censor—i.e., have a low censorability—can thrive. An example is the [[pro-life]] movement: it has virtually a perfect "0%" censorability. |
| | | | |
| | == Censor-Prone Environments == | | == Censor-Prone Environments == |
| | | | |
| − | Different media, institutions and environments are more censor-prone than others. Colleges are extremely censor-prone environment, perhaps due to a small group of people acting with no accountability. The [[internet]] is at the opposite end of the spectrum, and is relatively immune to censorship. | + | Different media, institutions and environments are more censor-prone than others. Colleges are extremely censor-prone environment, perhaps due to a small group of people acting with no accountability. The [[internet]] is at the opposite end of the spectrum, and is relatively immune to censorship, except in the case of an authoritarian country, where bugs are implanted into computers. |
| | | | |
| | Most censored speech includes: | | Most censored speech includes: |
| Line 92: |
Line 92: |
| | Ideas and movements' censorability is affected by various factors, including: | | Ideas and movements' censorability is affected by various factors, including: |
| | * How easily the idea can be taken out of context | | * How easily the idea can be taken out of context |
| − | * How easily the idea can be distorted and connected with negative ideas (ie. falsely claiming opposition to affirmative action is racism) | + | * How easily the idea can be distorted and connected with negative ideas (i.e. falsely claiming opposition to affirmative action is racism) |
| | * How complex the idea is, or how much background is required to understand it (complex ideas are easy to obfuscate, while simple ideas are hard to censor) | | * How complex the idea is, or how much background is required to understand it (complex ideas are easy to obfuscate, while simple ideas are hard to censor) |
| | | | |
| | == Ways to Reduce Censorability == | | == Ways to Reduce Censorability == |
| | | | |
| − | Quantification of censorability may facilitate reducing the censorability of a movement or good idea. Just as exercise improves physical conditioning, there may be techniques for enhancing the resilient attributes of a message. Specifically, some methods to reduce censorability: | + | Quantification of censorability may facilitate reducing the censorability of a movement or good idea. Just as exercise improves physical conditioning, there may be techniques for enhancing the resilient attributes of a message. From the above equation, there are two general obvious ways to reduce censorability: reduce '''c''', or increase '''o'''. Specifically, some methods to reduce censorability: |
| | * Use rote learning to repeat a message, then when words are altered, the difference is obvious. In the [[Pledge of Allegiance]], the line ''"One nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all"'' will seem different when "under God" is removed. The rote repetition can reveal censorship. | | * Use rote learning to repeat a message, then when words are altered, the difference is obvious. In the [[Pledge of Allegiance]], the line ''"One nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all"'' will seem different when "under God" is removed. The rote repetition can reveal censorship. |
| | * Repeat a core message multiple times on a page, such as at the top, middle, and bottom. If one gets censored, the others might remain. | | * Repeat a core message multiple times on a page, such as at the top, middle, and bottom. If one gets censored, the others might remain. |
| − | * Reword a core message, after stating the rote form, using different words to avoid a global "search-and-replace" of all identical wording. The [[commandment]], ''"Thou shalt not bear false witness against they neighbor"'' could be explained, later, as, "Do not tell lies about another member or person in your area". If the term "[[false witness]]" is removed, perhaps the other wording will remain. | + | * Reword a core message, after stating the rote form, using different words to avoid a global "search-and-replace" of all identical wording. The [[commandment]], ''"Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor"'' could be explained, later, as, "Do not tell lies about another member or person in your area". If the term "[[false witness]]" is removed, perhaps the other wording will remain. |
| | * Repeat a core message on multiple pages, or in multiple images, so that censorship of all instances will require an enormous amount of effort, or reveal suspicious gaps. On some obelisks of [[Ancient Egypt]], the gaps in the [[hieroglyphic writing]], carved in stone, reveal how names or words have been chiseled away and censored. | | * Repeat a core message on multiple pages, or in multiple images, so that censorship of all instances will require an enormous amount of effort, or reveal suspicious gaps. On some obelisks of [[Ancient Egypt]], the gaps in the [[hieroglyphic writing]], carved in stone, reveal how names or words have been chiseled away and censored. |
| | | | |
| | {{Conservapedia}} | | {{Conservapedia}} |
| − | [[category:Conservapedia]] | + | [[Category:Conservapedia]] |