Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 639: Line 639:  
#If you don't like the law, why not give constructive criticism to Arizona telling them how the bill can be improved further by showing them what parts of the bill you think needs to be amended instead of "throwing it out the window" altogether? Just because there are some parts of the bill that you disagree with doesn't mean that it should be "thrown out the window."
 
#If you don't like the law, why not give constructive criticism to Arizona telling them how the bill can be improved further by showing them what parts of the bill you think needs to be amended instead of "throwing it out the window" altogether? Just because there are some parts of the bill that you disagree with doesn't mean that it should be "thrown out the window."
 
#If you currently have nothing to back up your reasons why you hate the bill so much, on what basis do you criticize the bill?
 
#If you currently have nothing to back up your reasons why you hate the bill so much, on what basis do you criticize the bill?
 +
#Did you know that there are other states that have tougher immigration policies than Arizona's new act on illegal immigration? Why do you only criticize Arizona, but not other states for their much harsher immigration policies?
 
#A member of the Somalian Al Shabaab terrorist group may be trying to get into Texas through Mexico. U.S. Homeland Security has asked law enforcement in Houston to be on the lookout for a suspected member of Al Shabaab, an Al Qaida ally based in Somalia<ref> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37368665 </ref>  <ref> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlSrvfP_Ua8 </ref>. With this in mind, do you prefer Arizona’s new enforcement law against illegal immigration over terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States? Or do you prefer terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States over Arizona’s enforcement law against illegal immigration? Which of the 2 options would you pick if you had to and why?
 
#A member of the Somalian Al Shabaab terrorist group may be trying to get into Texas through Mexico. U.S. Homeland Security has asked law enforcement in Houston to be on the lookout for a suspected member of Al Shabaab, an Al Qaida ally based in Somalia<ref> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37368665 </ref>  <ref> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlSrvfP_Ua8 </ref>. With this in mind, do you prefer Arizona’s new enforcement law against illegal immigration over terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States? Or do you prefer terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States over Arizona’s enforcement law against illegal immigration? Which of the 2 options would you pick if you had to and why?
 
#Let's see if you understand the bill if you have sincerely read it. In your own words, how would you summarize the bill?
 
#Let's see if you understand the bill if you have sincerely read it. In your own words, how would you summarize the bill?
389

edits

Navigation menu