Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Moon (view source)

Revision as of 04:54, July 22, 2010

557 bytes added ,  04:54, July 22, 2010
→‎Rate of Recession: The moon's orbit itself is unstable, and it wouldn't take much extrapolation backwards before it becomes impossible to fast-forward to what the moon is doing now. For example,
Line 936: Line 936:  
:I commented the section out, as  the ''extrapolation backwards'' isn't shown: two weeks should have been enough to come up with some calculation/estimation. As I have shown [[Talk:Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth#Receding_Moon|here]], the ''extrapolation backwards'' doesn't lead to a contradiction.
 
:I commented the section out, as  the ''extrapolation backwards'' isn't shown: two weeks should have been enough to come up with some calculation/estimation. As I have shown [[Talk:Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth#Receding_Moon|here]], the ''extrapolation backwards'' doesn't lead to a contradiction.
 
:[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 08:59, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
 
:[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 08:59, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: There is less discussion of this in universities than there should be, because quickly it leads to the conclusion of a young earth-moon model.  Tides are not the only problem with extrapolating backwards.  The moon's orbit itself is unstable, and it wouldn't take much extrapolation backwards before it becomes impossible to fast-forward to what the moon is doing now.  For example, extrapolate back far enough and the moon would be drifting towards the earth, not away as currently observed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:54, 22 July 2010 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/796577"

Navigation menu