89
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + +
→How AiG Isn't Science
::::Creation science ''is'' real science. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:38, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Creation science ''is'' real science. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:38, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::Creation Science is to science what lightning bugs are to lightning (or possibly, what rat poison is to rats, since its only purpose is to KILL a branch of science). It's a collection of efforts to shoehorn the fossil record, astronomy, geology. etc, into the framework provided by a 4000-year-old fairy tale told by illiterate herders. What's next, [[Scientific Geo-Terrapinism]]? --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 15:12, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
No. See the article on falsifiability at my talk page.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:42, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
No. See the article on falsifiability at my talk page.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:42, 1 April 2007 (EDT)