Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
My say
Line 37: Line 37:     
:I don't think Germany would have won "but for" the U.S. The entry of the U.S. into tht war, in my estimation was just the last nail in the coffin for the Kaiser.  We may have accelerated the end of the war, but Germany didn't have the resources to pull it out.  They might, however, have been able to stretch the war out long enough to force a settlement on better terms than they did, this (possibly) preventing the rise of Hitler (though virulent anti-Semitism and an oddly powerful sense of cultural superiority was rampant in Germany for a long time before the Nazis, who merely seized on them, so who knows whether a better settlement would really have prevented the rise of Nazism). [[User:JesusSaves|JesusSaves]] 03:56, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:I don't think Germany would have won "but for" the U.S. The entry of the U.S. into tht war, in my estimation was just the last nail in the coffin for the Kaiser.  We may have accelerated the end of the war, but Germany didn't have the resources to pull it out.  They might, however, have been able to stretch the war out long enough to force a settlement on better terms than they did, this (possibly) preventing the rise of Hitler (though virulent anti-Semitism and an oddly powerful sense of cultural superiority was rampant in Germany for a long time before the Nazis, who merely seized on them, so who knows whether a better settlement would really have prevented the rise of Nazism). [[User:JesusSaves|JesusSaves]] 03:56, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
- No, because the Germans attacked Britain. Americans died on the Lucitania, but the Germans were targeting the UK and not the US. At that time, the US was weak but Britain could easily have defended itself with no American help whatsoever. American involvement in WWI was just a waste of loves.
7

edits

Navigation menu