626
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 495:
Line 495: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 20:56, April 1, 2007
, 20:56, April 1, 2007no edit summary
:Wikipedia will use the euphemism "militant" instead of "terrorist", as Epicurius's example above shows. The second reference to "terrorist" is contrary to Wikipedia's NPOV and I expect it may be replaced. Epicurius reinforces the criticism of bias.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:20, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
:Wikipedia will use the euphemism "militant" instead of "terrorist", as Epicurius's example above shows. The second reference to "terrorist" is contrary to Wikipedia's NPOV and I expect it may be replaced. Epicurius reinforces the criticism of bias.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:20, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
::Well, in the case above, they use both "militant" and "terrorist" to describe Al Qaeda, so, that's at least a baby step when it comes to calling terrorists terrorists. I guess we'll have to keep watching it to see what gets removed and what stays.--[[User:Epicurius|Epicurius]] 16:56, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
::And Conservapedia using Wikipedia permalinks isn't at all hypocritical, is it? [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 14:15, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
::And Conservapedia using Wikipedia permalinks isn't at all hypocritical, is it? [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 14:15, 1 April 2007 (EDT)