Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
that statement seems out of place
Line 5: Line 5:     
==Criticism==
 
==Criticism==
Neil Seeman, the director of the Canadian Statistical Assessment Service, said, "Just because a study or pronouncement carries the imprimatur of the WHO should not mean it is sacrosanct," about the WHO. <ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-seeman050103.asp WHO Says What?</ref> Philip Stevens wrote, "[t]he World Health Organization is increasingly working against American values and the interests of the poor, [and] the U.S. should seriously consider cutting back the funds until the WHO adopts a more practical outlook." <ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/stevens200512020821.asp WHO’s in Charge?</ref>
+
Neil Seeman, the director of the Canadian Statistical Assessment Service, said, "Just because a study or pronouncement carries the imprimatur of the WHO should not mean it is sacrosanct," about the WHO.<ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-seeman050103.asp WHO Says What?</ref> Philip Stevens wrote, "[t]he World Health Organization is increasingly working against American values and the interests of the poor, [and] the U.S. should seriously consider cutting back the funds until the WHO adopts a more practical outlook."<ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/stevens200512020821.asp WHO’s in Charge?</ref>
 
  −
*"So what's wrong with the WHO and Commonwealth Fund studies? Let me count the ways."
  −
<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/08/why_the_us_ranks_low_on_whos_h.html Why the U.S. Ranks Low on WHO's Health-Care Study</ref>
      
==External links==
 
==External links==
24

edits

Navigation menu