1,590
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 115:
Line 115: +
→False arguments based on slippery wording
::[[Walling]] ... sorry, I guess I went on a bit of a tangent there, didn't I? You know, one idea sparking another. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:43, 30 July 2010 (EDT)
::[[Walling]] ... sorry, I guess I went on a bit of a tangent there, didn't I? You know, one idea sparking another. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:43, 30 July 2010 (EDT)
:::Not a problem at all. Like I said, I heartily agree, I just wasn't sure if one of my numerous copy edits had done the same. I added a cite to the walling article, I think, but I think that's still good. "We need to distinguish between real [[torture]] and "things prohibited by anti-torture laws". I ''definitely'' have to agree on that one. Maybe I'm wrong in this, given that I see no problem with "enhanced interrogation" as I hear it called now (I mean come on, at summer camp we'd see who could hold our breath the longest in the deep end of the pool, and we never complained that it "simulated drowning") but I think that the distinction you mentioned probably gets washed away too much, wouldn't you say? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 23:40, 30 July 2010 (EDT)