Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 03:56, August 2, 2010

856 bytes added ,  03:56, August 2, 2010
It's easy to search for "general relativity" and "conservative field" on the internet and see how little has been written about this. That is telling in itself.
Line 394: Line 394:     
[[User:Simeon|Simeon]] 23:13, 1 August 2010 (EDT)
 
[[User:Simeon|Simeon]] 23:13, 1 August 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Simeon, if you "give up," then that is your own choice.  You have not disproved the counterexample.  Instead, you first described the twin paradox as being only about special relativity, and when I pointed out that it exists under general relativity too, you then agree yet do not fully address the substantive issue presented by the paradox.  For example, the amount of acceleration undertaken by the twin in his journey will affect his age independent of his time spent away.  His subsequent age is ''not'' path independent even in time-space coordinates.
 +
 +
: It's easy to search for "general relativity" and "conservative field" on the internet and see how little has been written about this.  That is telling in itself.  I'm happy to continue to discuss this here with you or anyone else.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:56, 1 August 2010 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,644

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/800074"

Navigation menu