Changes

[[Image:Brueghel-tower-of-babel.jpg|center|thumb|400px|The [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] progagandist organization the [[National Center for Science Education]] recently moved their headquarters.  Above is their newly refurbished headquarters the Tower of Evobabble.<ref>http://creation.com/how-religiously-neutral-are-the-anti-creationist-organisations</ref>]]

[[Image:Brueghel-tower-of-babel.jpg|center|thumb|400px|The [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] progagandist organization the [[National Center for Science Education]] recently moved their headquarters.<ref>http://creation.com/how-religiously-neutral-are-the-anti-creationist-organisations</ref> Above is their newly refurbished headquarters the Tower of Evobabble.]]

[[File:Safarti3.jpg|center|thumb|400px|Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]] declares concerning numerous evolutionists' uses of the word "evolution":"...many evolutionary propagandists are guilty of the deceitful practice of equivocation, that is, switching the meaning of a single word (evolution) part way through an argument. A common tactic, ‘bait-and-switch,’ is simply to produce examples of change over time, call this ‘evolution,’ then imply that the GTE [General Theory of Evolution] is thereby proven or even essential, and [[creation]] disproved. The PBS ''Evolution'' series and the ''[[Scientific American]]'' article are full of examples of this fallacy."<ref>[[Jonathan Sarfati]],Ph.D., F.M. [http://www.creation.com/content/view/3262/ ''Refuting Evolution 2'', Chapter 1, Argument: Creationism is religion, not science]</ref>]]

[[File:Safarti3.jpg|center|thumb|400px|Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]] declares concerning numerous evolutionists' uses of the word "evolution":"...many evolutionary propagandists are guilty of the deceitful practice of equivocation, that is, switching the meaning of a single word (evolution) part way through an argument. A common tactic, ‘bait-and-switch,’ is simply to produce examples of change over time, call this ‘evolution,’ then imply that the GTE [General Theory of Evolution] is thereby proven or even essential, and [[creation]] disproved. The PBS ''Evolution'' series and the ''[[Scientific American]]'' article are full of examples of this fallacy."<ref>[[Jonathan Sarfati]],Ph.D., F.M. [http://www.creation.com/content/view/3262/ ''Refuting Evolution 2'', Chapter 1, Argument: Creationism is religion, not science]</ref>]]

{{clear}}

{{clear}}