Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 475: Line 475:     
The SFGate article does say that 47% of 9th graders showed proficiency on the english test; however, it also says that it improved 39% from the year before in the next sentence. Good job being 'neutral to the facts.'
 
The SFGate article does say that 47% of 9th graders showed proficiency on the english test; however, it also says that it improved 39% from the year before in the next sentence. Good job being 'neutral to the facts.'
 +
 +
: The improvement was probably not due to anything the school did, if you analyze the facts carefully.
 +
 +
: Yes, the opinion of liberal journalists are similar to the opinions of liberal Wikipedia editors.  The problem is that the facts set forth in the article do not support the Wikipedia entry, and were omitted from it entirely.  Oh, those bothersome facts!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:08, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
    
And, as far as I can see, the article is a good article; its well-cited, informative, and unbiased.[[User:NickJ10|NickJ10]] 08:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
And, as far as I can see, the article is a good article; its well-cited, informative, and unbiased.[[User:NickJ10|NickJ10]] 08:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
Line 483: Line 487:  
:[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 09:56, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 09:56, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
    +
:: Wrong on your first and last points.  The "health" clinic is a "sex-based" clininc.  It's not screening for real health problems, such as diabetes or obesity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:08, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
    
==Example 3==
 
==Example 3==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,372

edits

Navigation menu