Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1,914: Line 1,914:     
::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 08:14, 5 August 2010 (EDT)
 
::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 08:14, 5 August 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
One way of marrying the two ideas above (that there is no increase of conservative terms over time and that there is an increase in the "best" conservative terms over time) is simply to suggest that conservative terms are getting better in quality and not quantity, which is the point that Mr. Schlafly makes, I believe. An explanation that might want to be considered is that after a new term is coined, it may slowly lose its relevence over time. I would suggest that if you look at the vocabulary from the 17th century, many words have lost their relevence greatly. This presumably applies to conservative terms as well. So, a partial explanation for conservative terms increasing in "quality" over time may be the decrease in time-lag and thus an increase in relevence.--[[User:GrahamB|GrahamB]] 12:15, 6 August 2010 (EDT)
    
== Decrypt ==
 
== Decrypt ==
111

edits

Navigation menu