36
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 121:
Line 121: − +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 19:36, August 8, 2010
, 19:36, August 8, 2010→Explanation for some counterexamples
Thanks a lot in advance. [[User:MalP|MalP]] 12:25, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
Thanks a lot in advance. [[User:MalP|MalP]] 12:25, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
:"I do think it is important to '''only''' have counterexamples on here that are correct." Excuse me, but anyone with an education should realise that none of the counterexamples here are correct. But if you try to remove them, or even rationally debate them you'll get blocked, so don't bother. Just saying. --[[User:Houshalter|Houshalter]] 13:51, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
:"I do think it is important to '''only''' have counterexamples on here that are correct." Excuse me, but anyone with an education should realise that none of the counterexamples here are correct. But if you try to remove them, or even rationally debate them you'll get blocked, so don't bother. Just saying. --[[User:Houshalter|Houshalter]] 13:51, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
::I think you can only say with absolute certainty that something is correct/incorrect, after you have considered the example and debated about it with other people who are also considering it. I have a feeling that there are indeed quite some incorrect counterexamples in this article, but there many for which I can't come up with an explanation. Right now I'm only talking about a few examples for which I have some possible explanations. -[[User:MalP|Mal Peeters]] ([[User_talk:MalP|talk]]) 15:36, 8 August 2010 (EDT)