Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
In '''''Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo''''', 418 U.S. 241, 258 (1974) a unanimous [[U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated a right-of-reply state statute that required newspapers to print the reply of a candidate for public office whose personal character has been criticized by that newspaper's editorials.
+
A place where nobody dared to go
 +
The love that we came to know
 +
They call it Xanadu
   −
The [[First Amendment]] erects a virtually insurmountable barrier between government and the print media so far as government tampering, in advance of publication, with news and editorial content is concerned.
+
And now
 +
Open your eyes and see
 +
What we have made is real
 +
We are in Xanadu
   −
Justices [[William Brennan]] and [[William Rehnquist]] concurred to emphasize that this holding did not affect "right of retraction" statutes that require newspapers to retract errors.
+
A million lights are dancing
−
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
And there you are
−
[[category:First Amendment]]
+
A shooting star
 +
An everlasting world
 +
And you're here with me
 +
Eternally
 +
 
 +
Xanadu, Xanadu,
 +
(now we are here)
 +
In Xanadu
 +
Xanadu, Xanadu,
 +
(now we are here)
 +
In Xanadu
 +
 
 +
Xanadu, your neon lights will shine
 +
For you, Xanadu
 +
 
 +
The love
 +
The echoes of long ago
 +
You needed the world to know
 +
They are in Xanadu
 +
 
 +
The dream
 +
That came through a million years
 +
That lived on through all the tears
 +
It came to Xanadu
 +
 
 +
A million lights are dancing
 +
And there you are
 +
A shooting star
 +
An everlasting world
 +
And you're here with me
 +
Eternally
 +
 
 +
Xanadu, Xanadu,
 +
(now we are here)
 +
In Xanadu
 +
Xanadu, Xanadu,
 +
(now we are here)
 +
In Xanadu
 +
 
 +
Now that I'm here
 +
Now that you're near in Xanadu
 +
Now that I'm here
 +
Now that you're near in Xanadu
 +
Xanadu...
21

edits

Navigation menu