Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎No counterexamples to the Bible?: Our entries here are substantive, and will remain so.
Line 5: Line 5:     
::Sorry, I must have missed something. Which counterexamples did TylerGD post? If they have all been Proven wrong with a capital P, shouldn't this article address them and state why they are wrong, as with every other counterexample here, instead of just not considering them? --[[User:MarcoT2|MarcoT2]] 11:48, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
 
::Sorry, I must have missed something. Which counterexamples did TylerGD post? If they have all been Proven wrong with a capital P, shouldn't this article address them and state why they are wrong, as with every other counterexample here, instead of just not considering them? --[[User:MarcoT2|MarcoT2]] 11:48, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::The page history contains the edits [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_the_Bible&diff=803692&oldid=803632 here].  I found the alleged "counterexamples" to be remarkably trivial and non-substantive.  Our entries here are substantive, and will remain so.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:59, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu