2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 97:
Line 97: +
→encyclopedic solution
:::You're not that big on US domestic history and you revert my political history statements.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:16, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
:::You're not that big on US domestic history and you revert my political history statements.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:16, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
::::It wasn't a history statement; it was the recycled DNC program agenda from recent years. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:20, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
::::It wasn't a history statement; it was the recycled DNC program agenda from recent years. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:20, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
The Reagan Realignment is history buddy, and I provided two books written by conservative Republican political scientists, but I can see why those would be within your area of expertise to refute. But again, no problem. The article's wound up free of anything controversial.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:22, 1 April 2007 (EDT)