1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 59:
Line 59: + + +
→How AiG is supposedly not scientific
:I don't know what skull example you are referring to. I've searched the archived talk page of Ames' and your talk page for "skull" with no hits on either.
:I don't know what skull example you are referring to. I've searched the archived talk page of Ames' and your talk page for "skull" with no hits on either.
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:37, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:37, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
Once again, give me an example of a potential falsification statement for creationism. Please. Also, I disagree with Ames to a certain extent. If a human skull was found in a 300 million year old strata, or homo erectus in a 1000 year old strata, or the whole steg bone thing, the current theory of evolution would be largely invalidated/falsified. So, it is falsifiable. Whether or not it will eventually happen, well, I have opinions based on fact, but no crystal ball. Give me any such example from creationism...I really do want to know.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 22:41, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==