Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Counterexample 9 (Jesus action-at-a-distance): Nothing described in the Bible violates physics. Newton used the Bible to guide him to the truth for that reason.
Line 177: Line 177:     
::Also please note that I am arguing for Jesus being God, not against, so please do not mistake that. --mvgilpatrick 17:50, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
 
::Also please note that I am arguing for Jesus being God, not against, so please do not mistake that. --mvgilpatrick 17:50, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
 +
 +
::: No, I don't think all these examples are the same.  Physics does ''not'' categorically state that it is impossible for a creature to walk on water.  Physics does ''not'' say that replication is impossible.  There is no reason to think the multiplication of the loaves generated mass from nothing, rather than using existing mass to replicate.  But Relativity does insist that action-at-a-distance is impossible.
 +
 +
::: Nothing described in the Bible violates physics.  Newton used the Bible to guide him to the truth for that reason.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:36, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
    
== lack of a single useful device ==
 
== lack of a single useful device ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu