27
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: + +
Debate:Why are there so few homosexual athletes (view source)
Revision as of 01:50, August 13, 2010
, 01:50, August 13, 2010no edit summary
By bigotry you must mean defending young children from mongering menacing freaks. What is this? Why would America endorse an Australia Athelete in the first place? THis prospect is insulting to Human Intellegence, which is created by [[God]]. You need strong Biblical education, both of you. It is somewhat humurous for Hitchens to reference God crying over an website, The [[Fool]] says in his heart there is no God. You both match the Biblical definition of fools, consult a Bible to prove my point, THanks!
By bigotry you must mean defending young children from mongering menacing freaks. What is this? Why would America endorse an Australia Athelete in the first place? THis prospect is insulting to Human Intellegence, which is created by [[God]]. You need strong Biblical education, both of you. It is somewhat humurous for Hitchens to reference God crying over an website, The [[Fool]] says in his heart there is no God. You both match the Biblical definition of fools, consult a Bible to prove my point, THanks!
Veritas vos Liberabit. ([[User:Baronvonbob|Baronvonbob]] 21:28, 26 September 2009 (EDT))
Veritas vos Liberabit. ([[User:Baronvonbob|Baronvonbob]] 21:28, 26 September 2009 (EDT))
The reason there are no homosexual atheletes is quite simple. Playing sports requires [[Machismo]] which homosuxuals lack, much like Richard Dawkins. If you wan't to see homosexuals in sports watch soccer, where I am sure there is an abundance. I'm 90% certain Richard Dawkins played soccer in high school--[[User:SayidR|SayidR]] 21:50, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
==References==
==References==