4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
Godwins Law is indeed a real law
There is some credibility behind Godwin's law, so I'll leave it alone.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
There is some credibility behind Godwin's law, so I'll leave it alone.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
Is this a real "law"? It seems like a thinly veiled attack on our evolution articles. I move for its deletion. --[[User:DReynolds|DReynolds]] 16:30, 17 January 2009 (EST)
Is this a real "law"? It seems like a thinly veiled attack on our evolution articles. I move for its deletion. --[[User:DReynolds|DReynolds]] 16:30, 17 January 2009 (EST)
It is indeed a real law, and I just laughed out loud at what you just said, as the evolution article, which until recently had a prominent picture of Hitler displayed, would be a classic example of what might be just cause for the invocation of Godwin's Law