Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
some MIT prof has $200,000 that says the proof is wrong
* Before consideration, a proposed solution must be published in a refereed mathematics publication of worldwide repute (or such other form as the SAB shall determine qualifies), and it must also have general acceptance in the mathematics community two years after. [http://www.claymath.org/millennium/Rules_etc/ Clay Mathematics Institute]
* Before consideration, a proposed solution must be published in a refereed mathematics publication of worldwide repute (or such other form as the SAB shall determine qualifies), and it must also have general acceptance in the mathematics community two years after. [http://www.claymath.org/millennium/Rules_etc/ Clay Mathematics Institute]
* MIT computer scientist Scott Aaronson is so confident that the proof is wrong, he’s offered Deolalikar an additional $200,000 if he’s awarded the $1,000,000 Clay Millenium Prize for the proof. [http://www.geekosystem.com/p-np-proof-vinay-deolalikar/]
==Links==
==Links==