Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 01:46, August 16, 2010

618 bytes added ,  01:46, August 16, 2010
→‎Reversion of my edit: Journals won't publish any data contrary to Relativity; accepted papers have even been forced to withdraw for this reason
Line 754: Line 754:     
:::: I agree with RonLar. The GPS clocks are accurate enough for relativity to matter. It is well-known that the system uses relativistic corrections. Otherwise, it would disprove relativity, and where is the paper proving that? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 21:17, 15 August 2010 (EDT)
 
:::: I agree with RonLar. The GPS clocks are accurate enough for relativity to matter. It is well-known that the system uses relativistic corrections. Otherwise, it would disprove relativity, and where is the paper proving that? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 21:17, 15 August 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::: Journals won't publish any data contrary to Relativity; accepted papers have even been forced to withdraw for this reason.  For example, where are the data on the advance of the perihelion of Mercury (which now disproves Relativity) or the binary pulsar (which now disproves Relativity despite the Nobel Prize being given for it years ago).
 +
 +
::::: The claim that GPS system "uses relativistic corrections" is meaningless.  If some but not all relativistic corrections are used, as discussed above, then this disproves rather than proves Relativity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:46, 15 August 2010 (EDT)
    
==My Great-grandfather==
 
==My Great-grandfather==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,215

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/806007"

Navigation menu