126
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 479:
Line 479: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 03:36, April 2, 2007
, 03:36, April 2, 2007→Number 2
: Yes, the opinion of liberal journalists are similar to the opinions of liberal Wikipedia editors. The problem is that the facts set forth in the article do not support the Wikipedia entry, and were omitted from it entirely. Oh, those bothersome facts!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:08, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
: Yes, the opinion of liberal journalists are similar to the opinions of liberal Wikipedia editors. The problem is that the facts set forth in the article do not support the Wikipedia entry, and were omitted from it entirely. Oh, those bothersome facts!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:08, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
: 47%! That is pathetic. Any school that has a literary proficiency rate of less than 80% is failing to teach its students how to read. Why then, does Wikipedia praise this school for its "nuturing environment" and "academic innovation"?
And, as far as I can see, the article is a good article; its well-cited, informative, and unbiased.[[User:NickJ10|NickJ10]] 08:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
And, as far as I can see, the article is a good article; its well-cited, informative, and unbiased.[[User:NickJ10|NickJ10]] 08:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)