nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: +
Talk:University of Virginia (view source)
Revision as of 21:10, August 17, 2010
, 21:10, August 17, 2010→Salient facts?
TK: "We don't accept censorship here. Why would you remove salient facts and make the edit comment that you made this more accurate?"
TK: "We don't accept censorship here. Why would you remove salient facts and make the edit comment that you made this more accurate?"
:What salient facts did I remove? Are you referring to the unsupported claim that Dr. Sullivan "majored in Women's Studies", which I replaced with "true and verifiable" information for which a source was provided, as required by Conservapedia's Commandments? Or the completely unsupported allegation that there were unspecified "questions of her ability to lead the University"? Or bringing the comment about the wahoo fish more in line with what the source said? How do any of these not improve the article's accuracy? [[User:DuncanD|DuncanD]] 16:22, 17 August 2010 (EDT)
:What salient facts did I remove? Are you referring to the unsupported claim that Dr. Sullivan "majored in Women's Studies", which I replaced with "true and verifiable" information for which a source was provided, as required by Conservapedia's Commandments? Or the completely unsupported allegation that there were unspecified "questions of her ability to lead the University"? Or bringing the comment about the wahoo fish more in line with what the source said? How do any of these not improve the article's accuracy? [[User:DuncanD|DuncanD]] 16:22, 17 August 2010 (EDT)
::You mean to tell me you couldn't, after exhaustive searching, find any support that she essentially took "woman's studies" type of courses, Duncan? You couldn't find one source that brought into question her leadership ability? There is a responsibility that goes with stating you have improved something, and that goes beyond removing points that are not supported adequately in your opinion, and inserting only items you agree with and have found citations for. If you say you looked and couldn't find anything that goes to the preceding points, I will take your word for it. But are you willing to agree I should block you for ideological editing if I search and find such sources? --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:10, 17 August 2010 (EDT)