| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Creationism is what is known as deliberate ignorance. They steal your free will. FIGHT THE POWER!!!! Tehpwner.
| + | '''Deliberate ignorance''' is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include: |
| | + | |
| | + | * [[Howard Dean]], a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that [[taxpayer-funded abortion]] increases the number of [[abortion]]s<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?</ref> |
| | + | * [[abortionists]] refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have [[abortions]] |
| | + | * refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of [[Richard Sternberg]], whom they ostracize for having published an [[intelligent design]] article |
| | + | * [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters |
| | + | * [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]] |
| | + | * [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]<ref>This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php here].</ref> and the other [[counterexamples to evolution]]. |
| | + | * [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity |
| | + | * Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity. |
| | + | * [[Liberal Christianity|Liberal]] [[Cafeteria Christianity|cafeteria Christians]] refuse to consider [[Bible]] verses that contradict their preconceived notions of what the Bible should say. |
| | + | * Liberal Internet discussion boards quickly delete posts that present facts contradicting liberal ideology and ban users making such posts. |
| | + | (add more) |
| | + | |
| | + | Common expressions of [[deliberate ignorance]] include: |
| | + | |
| | + | *"I find that hard to believe!" (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by [[liberals]]<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?</ref>) |
| | + | * "I'm not aware of that!" (without admitting a failure to look) |
| | + | * "I've never seen that in the [[New York Times]]!" |
| | + | * "That's not what it said in my ([[public school]]) textbook!" |
| | + | * "Let's talk about something else!" |
| | + | * "I'm not interested in that!" |
| | + | * "They hate us for our freedom!" |
| | + | * "Complete suspension of disbelief!" |
| | + | * "That [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends me]]!" (used as an excuse not to consider facts or logic) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Crime of Deliberate Ignorance == |
| | + | |
| | + | '''Deliberate ignorance''' can be a crime. For example, jurors were instructed "to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy."<ref>http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/05/11/enron_jury_to_consider_deliberate_ignorance/</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | == References == |
| | + | {{reflist}} |
| | + | |
| | + | [[Category:Rhetoric]] |
| | + | [[Category:Liberal Traits]] |