| Line 104: |
Line 104: |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | <br />Aren't we overlooking 1 Kings 7:26? "And it was a hand breadth thick,.." The thickness must be taken into consideration. Using the equation 30C ÷ 3.1415962 + 2H = 10C. C=cubits, H=hand breadth. We are able to solve the equation using my cubit (18.5 inches), and we get:
| + | ---- |
| | + | Aren't we overlooking 1 Kings 7:26? "And it was a hand breadth thick,.." The thickness must be taken into consideration. Using the equation 30C ÷ 3.1415962 + 2H = 10C. C=cubits, H=hand breadth. We are able to solve the equation using my cubit (18.5 inches), and we get: |
| | | | |
| | 555 inches (30 x 18.5) circumference | | 555 inches (30 x 18.5) circumference |
| Line 110: |
Line 111: |
| | 176.662 inches (555 ÷ 3.14159) diameter | | 176.662 inches (555 ÷ 3.14159) diameter |
| | | | |
| − | The difference between 185 inches(10x18.5) and 176.662 inches is 8.338 inches. This is two of my hand breadths! (8.338÷2=4.169) Remember, you must take into account two hand breadths, one for the opposite sides of the circular object. | + | The difference between 185 inches(10x18.5) and 176.662 inches is 8.338 inches. This is two of my hand breadths!(8.338÷2=4.169) Remember, you must take into account two hand breadths, one for the opposite sides of the circular object. |
| | | | |
| − | You can measure your own cubit from elbow to longest finger tip and use it to solve the equation, and your solution will also be two of your hand breadths!! | + | You can measure your own cubit from elbow to longest finger tip, and the difference will be two of your hand breadths!! |
| | | | |
| | This example of Pi should be in the foreknowledge section. Pi is in the Bible 1000 B.C. before the Greeks rediscovered Pi!--[[User:Bryantjwb|Bryantjwb]] 22:47, 8 August 2010 (EDT) | | This example of Pi should be in the foreknowledge section. Pi is in the Bible 1000 B.C. before the Greeks rediscovered Pi!--[[User:Bryantjwb|Bryantjwb]] 22:47, 8 August 2010 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | : Interesting. Any comments by others on the validity of the above suggestion?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:51, 8 August 2010 (EDT) | | : Interesting. Any comments by others on the validity of the above suggestion?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:51, 8 August 2010 (EDT) |
| − |
| |
| − | : Rabbi Nehemiah was an Israelite, circa AD 150 (during the Tannaim era).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | He wrote the Mishnat ha-Middot (ca. AD 150), the earliest known Hebrew text on geometry. In it, he explained away the common belief that the Bible defines the geometric ratio π (pi) as being exactly equal to 3, based on the description in 1 Kings 7:23 (and 2 Chronicles 4:2) of the great bowl situated outside the Temple of Jerusalem as having a diameter of 10 cubits and a circumference of 30 cubits. He maintained that the diameter of the bowl was measured from the outside brim, while the circumference was measured along the inner brim, which with a brim that is one handbreadth wide (as described in 1 Kings 7:24 and 2 Chronicles 4:3) yields a ratio from the circular rim closer to the actual value of π. [1]
| |
| − | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbi_Nehemiah --[[User:Bryantjwb|Bryantjwb]] 00:22, 19 August 2010 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| | == Biblical Hindsight is 20/20 == | | == Biblical Hindsight is 20/20 == |