Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
276 bytes removed ,  10:27, April 2, 2007
unsourced statements - conservapedia commandment broken
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Biblical inerrancy''' is the doctrinal position that the original [[Bible]] is without flaw or error, even when it comes to the historical and scientific views presented in the Bible. This view is supported by the idea that the Bible is the message from God to mankind, and therefore cannot be [[Alleged Bible contradictions|in error]]. Biblical inerrancy is popular among [[Young Earth Creationists]] and [[Biblical literalists]]. One common argument used by proponents of Biblical inerrancy is that the Bible itself claims to be without error, though the claim is never convincingly sourced. This presents an interesting fallacy, since if the [[Alleged Bible contradictions|Bible]] cannot be proven inerrant, then the claim within it would be irrelevant.<ref>Geisler & Nix (1986). ''A General Introduction to the Bible.'' Moody Press, Chicago. ISBN 0-8024-2916-5</ref>  Moreover, at no time during its writing was the whole of it assembled for the claim to be made in the first place.
+
'''Biblical inerrancy''' is the doctrinal position that the original [[Bible]] is without flaw or error, even when it comes to the historical and scientific views presented in the Bible. This view is supported by the idea that the Bible is the message from God to mankind, and therefore cannot be [[Alleged Bible contradictions|in error]]. Biblical inerrancy is popular among [[Young Earth Creationists]] and [[Biblical literalists]]. This presents an interesting fallacy, since if the [[Alleged Bible contradictions|Bible]] cannot be proven inerrant, then the claim within it would be irrelevant.<ref>Geisler & Nix (1986). ''A General Introduction to the Bible.'' Moody Press, Chicago. ISBN 0-8024-2916-5</ref>   
 
   
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,916

edits

Navigation menu