Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Connive is too early: That would work! It's always good to preserve information for everyone's benefit.
Line 2,082: Line 2,082:  
With an origin date of 1601, "connive" is too early, I think.  We start at 1612, after publication of the [[KJV]] and completion of nearly all of [[Shakespeare]]'s works.  But "connive" is a fascination suggestion.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:42, 24 August 2010 (EDT)
 
With an origin date of 1601, "connive" is too early, I think.  We start at 1612, after publication of the [[KJV]] and completion of nearly all of [[Shakespeare]]'s works.  But "connive" is a fascination suggestion.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:42, 24 August 2010 (EDT)
 
:I was debating to put it in the Conservative Downgraded terms.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:56, 24 August 2010 (EDT)
 
:I was debating to put it in the Conservative Downgraded terms.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:56, 24 August 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
::That would work!  It's always good to preserve information for everyone's benefit.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:57, 24 August 2010 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu