Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: − +
→Peer Review: not precisely a "claim"
==Peer Review==
==Peer Review==
During his testimony at the trial of ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]]'', opponents of Intelligent Design claimed that this concept has not been published in peer-reviewed journals. In fact, Behe testified that his book was subjected to peer review as rigorous as that of journals:<ref>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/day12am.html#day12am177</ref>
During his testimony at the trial of ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]]'', opponents of Intelligent Design <s>claimed</s> that this concept has not been published in peer-reviewed journals. In fact, Behe testified that his book was subjected to peer review as rigorous as that of journals:<ref>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/day12am.html#day12am177</ref>
:Q (Plaintiffs' attorney). You would agree that peer review for a book published in the Trade Press is not as rigorous as the peer review process for the leading scientific journals, would you?
:Q (Plaintiffs' attorney). You would agree that peer review for a book published in the Trade Press is not as rigorous as the peer review process for the leading scientific journals, would you?