277
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + + +
Talk:Debate:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution? (view source)
Revision as of 15:52, April 2, 2007
, 15:52, April 2, 2007no edit summary
: Read "Lemon v. Kurtzman," Supreme Court Case, and tell me what the Constitutions says afterwards.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 12:23, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
: Read "Lemon v. Kurtzman," Supreme Court Case, and tell me what the Constitutions says afterwards.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 12:23, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
A classic mistake. First you read the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, to get a true understanding of what their original intent was in the historical record of that time. Did that already. That way you'll know when a judge or lawyer has subverted the American peoples rights. i.e. Lemon v. Kurtzman. I'm going to give you a clue as to how to identify the big lie that subverts the 1st Amendment into the complete opposite of its original intent. When anyone only mentions the "establishment clause" out of context with the rest of the meaning that the whole amendment is meant to convey. That's why I provided article 52 of the now defunct USSR. It's only a recent attempt to establish the secular Humanist religion as the predominant religion. Recent political reinterpretations don't change the original, and whole true intent of it. So go ahead and site as many cases as you can where the rights of Americans have been taken away in a court of law. Just remember that everything Hitler and his nazis goons did was first made legal by his politically appointed judges and lawyers. You may remember what happened to that group of people that took religious liberty from people? So then, which version of the facts will you be casting your future with?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:52, 2 April 2007 (EDT)